Won't disagree with you MagiK .... except that the SF was still wrong in destroying (if such is the case) the items. I am not saying that sauceman should not have been discipined. I am saying that the SF was wrong in the chosen action. Yes, since sauceman is 18, his 'rents could toss him out, but that does not give them the right to destroy his property, nor does it give him the right to destroy theirs. Like I said, use the car comparison, since he IS old enough to buy one. Substitute car for games, and the SF is clearly wrong for the destruction.
Now, his 'rents were perfectly justified for disciplining him for bad grades. Especially on their dime.
Sauceman! Study harder! If you didn't like the course, you should have dropped it if it wasn't required!
__________________
[url]\"http://www.duryea.org/pinky/gurkin.wav\" target=\"_blank\">AYPWIP?</a> .... <img border=\"0\" alt=\"[1ponder]\" title=\"\" src=\"graemlins/1ponder.gif\" /> <br />\"I think so Brain, but isn\'t a cucumber that small called a gherkin?\"<br />  <br />Shut UP! Pinky!
|