|
I am not going to make another long post (well at least try not to). I think I made my point clear.
It seems the issue is public saftey. Second hand smoke is a danger to the public. Using this analogy how can ANY honest person looking at REAL evidence say alchohol is not a danger to public saftey? I will even argue more so and would be happy to back it up with a whole host of actual deaths not scientific research that has not shown me ONE single case of death from second hand smoke (excuse the run-on).
Using logical thinking there is no way one can say second hand smoke is more dangerous then the consumption of alchohol at places like bars. I am glad some take a taxi but FACTUAL evidence show plenty do not. Those plenty cause a major risk to public saftey. There is no way to lie in the face of evidence.
Asking if you smoke before you get a job is pure discrimination. Obesity as well as alchohol addiction can be just as fatal. If we were half way honest we would call it what it is and that is discrimination. I find it funny in the most obese country in the world we have people screaming about health. Imagine that.
I mean show me people who have got cancer from second hand smoke. Show it to me, dont tell me, show me. Don't show me some report done by people in a lab.. show me real living people who have had life put in danger because of second hand smoke. I want to hear about bob the bartender and nancy the waitress. Then after you do let me show you the graves filled with children, mothers, fathers of people who died for that right called alchohol. Let's compare and see exactly what is more a danger to public saftey. This is such a political hysterical issue it is not even funny.
Both are dangerous but I argue where does it end? There will never be a utopia folks. We might want to think twice about banning things less we end up with logans run.
|