04-22-2003, 03:35 PM
|
#16
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Timber Loftis:
quote: Originally posted by MagiK:
As for the money thing, historicly it has been the Dems that have outspent the repugs
|
Disagree entirely. Dems hire 10 government workers, Repugs come along and call it waste, fire the 10 workers, and subcontract their jobs to a 175-member firm. That's not decreasing government, it's privatizing it. Also, can you back up this statement, especially in light of Reagan, Bush41, and Bus43 spending increases, particularly for the military.
Or, did I misunderstand that whole "read my lips" thing?
You misunderstood my post kiddo I ment in the campaign arena [img]smile.gif[/img] Im not saying that repugs cannot waste as many billions as the Dems...I think that by now both parties are quite capable of wasting infinate amounts of capital.
Both are addicted to spending - wait, addicted is a false word that makes it seem it's not their fault. Both choose to keep spending like rabid Valley Girls with Auntie's credit card.
I completely and whole heartedly agree with you on this comment [img]smile.gif[/img]
Edit: My thought is that they should take a number that is 10% less than what the current annual budget is and say this is IT. This is the absolute spending cap, so live within your budget (to the federal government)[/QUOTE]
[ 04-22-2003, 03:37 PM: Message edited by: MagiK ]
|
|
|