Quote:
Originally posted by andrewas:
quote:
Originally posted by Lavindathar:
]Exactly.
I knew it said that, just wanted confirmation. It isn't recognised, because an errection is the sign that the man is willing. By law in England anyway.
And without an errection, the rapist isn't going to get very far.
|
OK, legaly a woman cant rape a man. So what? People interpreting the law too strictly is one of the reasons the justice system is in the state its in.
However, a mans "mechanisms" (nice euphemism whoever came up with it) are not under completely concious control (Unless your some kind of super-yogi) and react indepenently of, and in spite of the mind.
So from a pragmatic standpoint it is possible for what most people would interpret as rape to take place. And thats not even including the more inventive methods.[/QUOTE]I agree with you.
My oldest brother was held down by a pack of girls and raped behind their school when he was 16. He's a little guy, barely 5' tall and
maybe a hundred lbs.
He wasn't willing in spite of his "mechanism" displaying another opinion and it really messed with his head.
He had no way of prosecuting the crime simply because "his mechanism" was working against his will.