[WillowIX]

Originally posted by MagiK: Willow that would never work, because then you wouldhave people declaring censorship...cant have that here...better to make the artists get jobs and paint or whatever in their spare time.....quite a few artists do just that...and some even make quite a good living this way.....In the end at best the government subsidy is propping up marginal talent at best. As TL pointed out, there isn't that much money devoted to it so the vast amount of art must be supporting itself.

I know it wouldn´t work MagiK. But wouldn´t it be great if it did? But censorship already exists.

Still I don´t believe it is censorship. If you don´t get the funding you want, no one is telling you you can´t do it. They only tell you you have to get the funding by your own means, i.e. get a job. No one will be forbidden to show a piece of art. [img]smile.gif[/img]

Edit: MagiK, the subject if this thread is hilarious. I don´t know if you thought of it while posting the poll but "Congress spending tax dollars". Isn´t that what they are there for? [img]graemlins/biglaugh.gif[/img]

[ 03-13-2003, 03:05 PM: Message edited by: WillowIX ]