*Throws hands in air in disgust*
Can someone please explain to me why it is okay to deny someone freedom of movement (note, this IS on the UN Human Rights list) yet it is not okay to deny them the right to life???
I just don't get it. If their right to life is *that* sacred, in my mind it only means their punishment should INCREASE to repay society for the life they took.
Sure are a lot of namby-pambys here for a forum where most everyone has whacked Noober at least once.
