Quote:
Originally posted by LordKathen:
quote:
Originally posted by Timber Loftis:
I can't believe you guys have spent all this time arguing over what is really seen, academically, as a simple distinction: "hard" sciences and "soft" or "social" sciences. My college had three "divisions." Div. 1 was "arts," Division 3 was "sciences" (math, physics, chemistry, biology), and the middle division, divison 2, was "soft" or social sciences (economics, sociology, religion). Isn't that really what we're talking about?
|
Exactly!!! I live by hard science, literal testable IMPERICAL science. Not "soft" science, witch relies on phylosophy, faith, whatever. Can you not see this Yorick? This is what I have been saying all along. IMPERICAL science has no room for faith or phylosophy.[/QUOTE]AAAARRRGGHH!
FAITH IS THE RESULT! Faith and science are not opposites! Each use the other! Man this is frustrating Kathen!
I HAVE FAITH, and I USE SCIENCE!
You are telling me you're without faith? Fine. You say you rely on science? Fine. DON'T tell me what I do! I use both. They interweave and assist each other. HArmoniously. When I discover aspects of chemistry or biology I gain understanding of the Trinity for example. Triunity.
I use the science of psycholgy to understand myself. I use sociology to understand humanity. I use economic science to get ahead financially, I use theology for life/relationship enhancement, I use geography and biology to enhance my appreciation of the planet, and increase my theology.
Conjoinment, not seperation!
Shheesh!
You don't? Fine. DON'T PRESCRIBE YOUR REALITY AND METHODOLOGY ONTO ME.
[ 01-28-2003, 02:13 PM: Message edited by: Yorick ]