Faith and spirituality in general is such a personal thing that arguments like these are so childish. It is one thing to have a question and want wide views. Wish to speak about history or try to give a fair and honest outlook to either/or argument. This is just a argument where people on each side want to try to prove (never happen, either way) and strike with venom at the other side.
Like much in life, both sides (science + religion (why is it always the christian religion in this argument?)) have strong and weak points. A few aspects are always left out when it comes to the science part. One, it is just a theory. Two, you can find plenty of other scientists who disagree with much or evolution in the way it is presented. Anyone who has gave a honest look at evolution (the concept in its whole) can see the huge problems with it. Same goes with religion. Can anyone look me in the eye and not laugh and say science does not have a agenda? How about religion? I could bore you all with the fraud, distortion, errors about evolution if you would like?
Likewise religion has plenty of gaps, confusion, "nonsense", and plenty of fraud to go around through the history.
Both take a degree of faith. Science and the science (religion) of evolution are totally two different set of rules.
I am spiritual but not religious in anyway. I think science has done a great many things. However both can be very dangerous weapons to push a agenda. Science is all "facts" based on undisputable evidence? Yeah that worked on me when I was in middle school. Debate the issue and not get all personal people. Try it
|