Quote:
Originally posted by Dundee Slaytern:
quote:
Originally posted by Alson:
Damn you Jim! Damn you! [img]graemlins/crying.gif[/img] [img]tongue.gif[/img]
|
What I find amusing is that halfway during our debates, Jim will enter and announce new facts that render both of us wrong. [img]graemlins/hehe.gif[/img] [/QUOTE]Yes, i thought about it, too.
Although being the reviewer of a book is always easier than being its writer... 
[img]tongue.gif[/img]
Quote:
How is it not fair? Foebane remained constant throughout all three combinations. If you ask me to remove the +6 damage from all three, the average damage will still balance out, and the Equaliser will be made to look even worse. 
|
It's not fair because it gives Belm a great advantage.
The more damage Foebane does, the more shining Belm is - that's why FoA+5 and Belm is such a good combo.
Quote:
|
The jury will now be horrified. Cheers. [img]smile.gif[/img]
|
But there are more evidents, your honor!
Try it out without Foebane's +6 bonus, and with
GWW.
I would add 23 STR here, but that would be too mean... Right?