09-30-2002, 10:33 AM
|
#7
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rokenn:
quote:
Originally posted by MagiK:
Did anyone note where this article came from? SFGate.com?
First off thsi is NOT a....unbiased news forum, secondly they didn't mention these people who were not allowed to fly were involved with militant groups that have in the past taken radical actions....If you choose to take action...at least have the balls to accept the consequences.
|
Magik, do you have access to some sort of secret intelligence of the people involved in this incident? If not, then how do you 'know' the article didn't mention their supposed radical actions? Or are you just pulling facts out of the air? Also SFGate is the web site for the San Francisco Chronicle, which happens to the be daily paper out and is no more libral then the New York Times.
Besides, isn't the idea of a militant peace group a little oxymornic, kind of like military intelligence? [img]tongue.gif[/img] [/QUOTE] Wouldn't you like to know? [img]smile.gif[/img]
Seriously though, if you do some research you can find things out. Try checking out some of the other news services that also report the story.
The New York Times is pretty far to the left in my opinion.
As for the hows and whys of what I think, I should have stated my opinion as more of an informed opinion rather than a hard fact. I am not in the habbit of just pulling "facts" out of my backside howver. I am just more familiar with how these "sinister" government monitoring agencies really work than your average conspiracy theorist [img]smile.gif[/img]
They didn't get kicked out of the system just because they did not like George Bush. If that were the case, almost half the voting populace would not be allowed to fly [img]smile.gif[/img]
I will attempt to refrain from upsetting the conspiracy apple cart in the future...please go ahead and be afraid...be very afraid 
|
|
|
|