[John D Harris]

Iron_Ranger,
I just got "Let freedom Ring" for my birthday, and I've read the first chapter so far. I've found nothing that has been presented as facts to be factualy wrong. The problem is that conclusions Mr Hannity comes to based on the facts he states, are missrepresented as statments of facts, by his distractors. Instead of argueing the facts, or even the logic on how the conclusions where reached, they give in to name calling, or claims of closemindness, backed by feelings not facts. Feelings are fine, and if you are truly open minded about feelings, then they must also accept the feelings of Mr Hannity as being JUST as Valid as their own. After all feelings are feelings, and Mr Hannity is as intitled to his feelings as they are. In my, 41 years of life on this rock, that kind of honesty is rare.

Lharae, Don't give up you day job, you're not that good at mind reading. How do you know how Mr Hannity felt? Have you asked Him? Show any of us where what he has writen was factualy incorrect, not opinions, but facts.

Everybody has an agenda one way or another, Thanks for one of the best indorsements to read the book. Since Mr. Hannity is not to be believed because he has an agenda, then your opinion, on his book, is also not to be believed, since you have an agenda.