I was just reading about a federal court ruling that just ruled the pledge of allegiance to be unconstitutional. in the article in talked about the part where it says "one nation (under god)" being unconstitutional because some atheist father complained that his child shouldn't have to say that. in a 2-1 vote this federal court ruled in favor of the father and prohibited says the pledge of allegiance in schools in the approximately 9 states that this court had jurisdiction over. I just wondered how people felt about this. Do you think that they are taking a perfectly innocent pledge of allegiance too far with this ruling, or do you think they are right to rule that way?
[ 06-26-2002, 08:28 PM: Message edited by: AzRaeL StoRmBlaDe ]
__________________
Now the swinging bridge<br />Is quieted with creepers. . . <br />Like our tendrilled life. -Basho
|