Ironworks Gaming Forum - View Single Post

Earthdog · 06-09-2002, 10:33 AM

Just my opinion here, not likely that the bill would ever be passed but if it were it would be another meaningless law.

All this law would be saying is that "the US government does NOT recognise the government trying the US Citizens in question. If neccssary we will attempt to rescue them."

In both cases this will never happen. The Bill WILL NOT be passed into LAW. secondly, The US would not invade a NATO ALLY for the sake of a nameless sergeant who supposedly committed a war crime.

For the US to invade a country it requires alot more than just one person being accused of a crime.

The reason the US is invading Afghanistan is multifold. They know the terrorist network that is centered there. The Governement is not the legally ruling governemnt elected by its citizens.

No matter how some people may dislike the US governement being in Afghanistan, the US has a SOLID LEGITEMATE REASON for being there, killing terrorists is just an added bonus.

And if anyone is wondering, most of he Australians Ive spoken with are perfectly happy and willing to let the US Government do what it wants with the Afghani prisoners that htey catch. In particular many Aussies would like to see the WHITE AUSTRALIAN MUSLIM CONVERT who fought for the Al Queda network HUNG BY HIS NARDS for violating everything that FREEDOM stands for.

Now who is the war criminal??? Should White Aussie muslim convert be tried for TREASON>>>??? After all, his nation is at WAR with the people he swore to defend with his life.

When do the War Crimes Trials begin on this case?

06-09-2002, 10:33 AM	#66
Earthdog Emerald Dragon Join Date: May 1, 2001 Location: melbourne victoria australia Age: 60 Posts: 960	Just my opinion here, not likely that the bill would ever be passed but if it were it would be another meaningless law. All this law would be saying is that "the US government does NOT recognise the government trying the US Citizens in question. If neccssary we will attempt to rescue them." In both cases this will never happen. The Bill WILL NOT be passed into LAW. secondly, The US would not invade a NATO ALLY for the sake of a nameless sergeant who supposedly committed a war crime. For the US to invade a country it requires alot more than just one person being accused of a crime. The reason the US is invading Afghanistan is multifold. They know the terrorist network that is centered there. The Governement is not the legally ruling governemnt elected by its citizens. No matter how some people may dislike the US governement being in Afghanistan, the US has a SOLID LEGITEMATE REASON for being there, killing terrorists is just an added bonus. And if anyone is wondering, most of he Australians Ive spoken with are perfectly happy and willing to let the US Government do what it wants with the Afghani prisoners that htey catch. In particular many Aussies would like to see the WHITE AUSTRALIAN MUSLIM CONVERT who fought for the Al Queda network HUNG BY HIS NARDS for violating everything that FREEDOM stands for. Now who is the war criminal??? Should White Aussie muslim convert be tried for TREASON>>>??? After all, his nation is at WAR with the people he swore to defend with his life. When do the War Crimes Trials begin on this case? __________________ THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE!!!