|
As with a lot of Global Warming Science, on either side, it's posted on the internet, it must be true. I don't need proof, I just need to know that someone, somewhere, said so. Like Al Gore, I don't need to consider all the facts, such as the source of the article I linked to, I just need to know that the story is there for all to see. This is the same logic used regularly, even in this discussion. Don't question, just believe, if you question...Therefore, I still have no answer as to why it's ok to use melting ice to prove it, but not ok to use not melting ice to disprove it. In this case, opposite doesn't mean opposite?
|