|
So by this test, they can, in spite of the fact that not all of the other 1/2 of the test subjects developed the cancer, say that the only reason those women didn't get cancer was because of the vaccine? It seems to me that the number of women who did get the cells for cancer would have had to be a lot higher to take into account the fact that not all women get cervical cancer. To me, it seems a bit misleading to say that the only reason those women didn't get the cancer was because they were vaccinated. Maybe it works, maybe not, I don't know, but I don't think that one real study constitutes proof. How many studies did they do with Viox to prove it was safe, only to wind up in court because it wasn't? You'll notice, in the linked article, that stock prices went up after they released the study results.
|