View Single Post
Old 02-19-2007, 11:26 PM   #1
robertthebard
Xanathar Thieves Guild
 

Join Date: March 17, 2001
Location: Wichita, KS USA
Age: 62
Posts: 4,537
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems...2/s1851776.htm

This was originally posted by Wellard in the General Discussion forum, but I don't understand what science supports the claim that outlawing incadescent bulbs will cut down on Carbon Dioxide emmissions. I found nothing in about an hour search that says they produce the gas. I'm against all light, due to my constant headaches, but I'm not going to go out and try to ban light in general. I'd like to know what science they are using for the figures in the article.

The only article I found that even remotely supported it was an article that also said we were going to have a rash of Cat 4 and 5 hurricanes last year...I'll let the the last year's weather speak for how seriously I'm going to take that argument. Conservation doesn't bother me. I conserve a lot of energy around my home, but I don't see the connection between incadescent bulbs, and carbon dioxide. What am I missing?
__________________
To those we have lost; May your spirits fly free.
Interesting read, one of my blogs.
robertthebard is offline   Reply With Quote