Quote:
Originally posted by Timber Loftis:
I vote France. I mean, while we're on a roll, me might as well go for the best parcels of property out there. If not France, then Syria, which has a nice benefit of bordering Iraq, which we already own, and also placing us nearer to Israel, our beloved ally. Forget Iran, it'll consume itself or become fully assimilated all on its own soon enough.
But, I think we should have gone to Africa first before the Middle East. Africa is likely easier to take as a continent, and it's worth a good 3 armies per turn. If we take the middle east, we still have all of Asia to round up. And almost no one ever collects the 7 armies for Asia on even one turn, much less 2 turns.
|
Absolute balderdash. You should invade Australia first and then build up your army in Siam. Alternatively invade Brazil, reinforce, then take the rest of S America.
Above all leave Kamchatka and Irkutsk alone. The worst error is to believe that Great Britain should be taken and held at all costs.