[Indemaijinj]

1) President Bush and Saddam Hussein......... Hussein is the bad guy.

True, even though you might disagree with some (or a lot) of Bush's policies he is an indefinately better leader than Saddam Hussein. Still, the knowledge that the enemy is viler, does not give one green light to act without responsibility. A war is a serious matter, not a thing just to be chosen in a moment of political enthusiasm.

2) If you have faith in the United Nations to do the right thing, keep this in mind. They have Libya heading the Committee on Human Rights and Iraq heading the Global Disarmament Committee. Do your own math here.

Yeah, but they are hardly the leaders of the organisation. The whole concept of the UN is to make sure that international policies that would only be in the interest of a limited part of the world from taking place. In order to win the approval of the UN one must convince that the policy would be in general interest to the international community. This could maybe have been done in this case. After all many would agree that the world would be better off without the Baath party sitting on Iraq. Unfortunately US diplomacy have been more about claiming the right to act without foreign interference.

3) If you use Google Search and type in "French Military Victories." your reply will be "Did you mean French Military Defeats?"

Err, that have been confirmed as being a joke. Besides, if you value a country's political stances after how useful they are in battle you are clearly a proponent of "might makes right". If that is the case I would only respect you out of fear.

4) If your only anti-war slogan is "No war for oil," sue your school district for allowing you to slip through the cracks and robbing you of the education you deserve.

This is an ad hominem argument. Generally considered flame. Discrediting another's argument by simply calling them stupid or uneducated is not a gud way of debating. Evin if it is done in a nifty fashion.

5) Saddam and Bin Laden will not seek United Nations approval before they try to kill us.

True, but does Saddam really want to kill us that badly? I think he values his position (and his life) too much to do anything that would so certainly mean his demise. After all, if Saddam started lobbing bombs after anything outside his borders the UN would certainly come round to support military action immediately!

6) Despite what some seem to believe, Martin Sheen is NOT the President. He plays one on T.V.

True.

7) Even if you are anti-war, you are still an "Infidel" and Bin Laden wants you dead, too.

True, the anti-war groups wants this guy dead (or otherwise neutralised) just as badly. After all Al Qaeda has caused hatred and strife like only the worst (Nazis, anyone?) have done.

8) If you believe in a "vast right-wing conspiracy," but not in the danger that Hussein poses, quit hanging out with the Dell computer dude.

Believing in any spurious vast conspiracies is stupid and dangerous. I agree with that.

9) We are not trying to liberate them.

What are we then trying to? Liberating them from the evil Baath regime seems to me to be the most noble goal for an invasion of Iraq.

10) Whether you are for military action, or against it, our young men and women overseas are fighting for us to defend our right to speak out. We all need to support them without reservation.

But does invading Iraq ulimately serve this purpouse?

[ 03-19-2003, 07:12 AM: Message edited by: Indemaijinj ]