[Iron_Ranger]

Originally posted by Spelca: Woman. [img]tongue.gif[/img] I said that I wasn't sure what they call WoMD and that I thought (my oppinion) that bombs are one of those. If Saddam is forbidden to have certain missiles because he might use them, isn't it hypocrisy that we would use them on him? We certainly have used them on other countries, like he has. Just that our use has been more recent. You might not agree with me, but that's my oppinion. I don't think it makes us any better than him. And not to mention all the new weapons that we are going to use on him. As if we know what kind of effect they'll have.[/QB]

LMAO @ your first line.

On subject, we have used them on other countries, yeah. Lets use Afghanstan for example, since it was the most recent.

Taliban supports Al-Queda, Al-Queda planned out and carried out 9/11. Thus it was all in retaliation.

That makes scence right? See if you can make scence out of any agression Saddam has thrown out.

I am by far not a military expert, but what do you mean we dont know what effect they will have? I highly doubt we will use WoMD (Biological, Poisens, ect.) on Iraq, we will use Smart bombs and such is my guess. And we do know what effect they will have.