Thread: Why?
View Single Post
Old 03-05-2003, 09:01 PM   #41
John D Harris
Ninja Storm Shadow
 

Join Date: March 27, 2001
Location: Northport,Alabama, USA
Age: 63
Posts: 3,577
Quote:
Originally posted by Chewbacca:
Quote:
Originally posted by MagiK:
Quote:
Originally posted by Spelca:
Quote:
Originally posted by Sir Taliesin:
What WoMD are we going to use against Saddam? Do you know something that I don't?
Well, maybe bombs aren't WoMD (though in my oppinion they are) but we are going to bomb them with that kind of missiles Saddam isn't allowed to have. Or not?[/QUOTE]You are saying we should fight only with those weapons that the UN allows Iraq?

As for what YOU think are weapons of mass destruction, I think you need to learn a little bit about "scale" killing a couple or a dozen people with a single bomb is far different from killing tens of thousands or even millions.....get a bit of perspective man.
[/QUOTE]I remember reading an unsubstantiated report that upwards of 30,000 Taliban were killed because of bombs in the U.S. air campaign in Afganistan.

Regardless, I think you are SERIOUSLY downplaying the devestation of bombs. As I recall one stray bomb during the gulf war killed hundreds of Iraqi as they hid in a shelter.

Also clusterbombs have a long lasting residual effects on population, although the EU and UN have called for a moritorum on these weapons, the U.S. still uses them.

Bombs don't just kill a few people, especially when hundreds of bombs are falling day in and day out.

I think you may benifit from some perspective as well.
[/QUOTE]That wasn't a stray bomb it was aimed at that target, a comand and control bunker, a legitamite target under any and all rules of war(an oxmoron if there ever was one ) If anybody is going to get pissed about that then get pissed at the right people responsible for it. The idiots that allowed their families into a comand and control bunker, the Iraqi military.
__________________
Crustiest of the OLD COOTS "Donating mirrors for years to help the Liberal/Socialist find their collective rear-ends, because both hands doesn't seem to be working.
Veitnam 61-65:KIA 1864
66:KIA 5008
67:KIA 9378
68:KIA 14594
69:KIA 9414
70:KIA 4221
71:KIA 1380
72:KIA 300

Afghanistan2001-2008 KIA 585
2009-2012 KIA 1465 and counting

Davros 1
Much abliged Massachusetts
John D Harris is offline   Reply With Quote