[Ronn_Bman]

Originally posted by Eisenschwarz: quote: OTH, It doesn't matter what the inspectors say does it? Bush is going to have his little war no matter what. Well, Mr Bling-Bling, that wasn't what I posted now was it? I posted some highlights of Mr. Blix's report to the UN, and you decided to post more anti US rhetoric.

You can’t judge things independent of the historical or materiel context,

Dramnek, you appear to be unable to speak at all without putting something in a US historical context.

The US government has never done things because of what’s “good” or “Right” instead it has always acted with self interest and has many times had the blood of innocents on it’s hands.
Why should this change now?

What nation doesn't act in it's own self-interest? What nation is good and right?

What nation has based their policy on what is good and right while ignoring the interests of its population?

What nation hasn't had the blood of innocents on it's hands?

Do you ever learn about those or do you only take US history classes?

A country (The USA) that has invented pretexts for war before (gulf of Tonkin), it has made unwarranted acts of aggression (bay of pigs, Libya)
and cannot necessarily be trusted now.

And that has exactly what to do with Mr. Blix's report? Was he in on those things? What about the problems he found in Iraq? That's what the post was about, but of course, your only response to that was "what does it matter" and then you go on an anti-US rant. Typical Dramnek.

The people who travel to Iraq to act as human sheilds are demonstrateing such a respect for human life that they are willing to die to prevent war (which will of course kill innocents as in afghanistan Etc), Compare that to the warmongering demonstrated by bush.

HTH.TIA.[/QUOTE]The people who travel to Iraq to act as shields are certainly brave and absolutely believe in their position, but unfortunately they are as much Saddam shields as war shields. By the reasoning I've seen you use, if they actually prevent the war and save Saddam won't they be responsible for anything he does? Any deaths he causes?

Back to one of your original points about other nations having VX. You say why shouldn't Saddam have VX and antrax, too. Obviously you don't care if he has these items and more and you don't care if everyone has them and uses them and you wouldn't care if he or the leader of any group uses them, but that's on your conscious.

DYAAFI.RYA

[ 01-28-2003, 06:52 AM: Message edited by: Ronn_Bman ]