well, you just cant beat that .. after all, trying to prove the wrongness of something usually requires logic. And since you just made up a theorie which sounds completely logical, it's going to be quite hard to prove its nonsense, since you allready used the very same thing i wanted to use, to show you were wrong. Hmm, does that make any sense ?
__________________
<strong> Odi et Amo. Quare id faciam facisse requires ? Nescio, sed fieri sentio et excrucior </strong><br /><br /><strong> Amantem cogit amare magis, sed bene velle minus </strong>
|