Thread: WWIII?
View Single Post
Old 01-04-2003, 05:18 AM   #10
Felix The Assassin
The Dreadnoks
 

Join Date: September 27, 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Age: 62
Posts: 3,608
Quote:
Originally posted by Iron_Ranger:
Alot of deaths? Well, all 3 of the countrys, Iraq, NK, and the US has big armys, thats for sure. But numbers dont matter a whole lot if one side has a lop sided advantage in Tech.
Joining this one late.
The US has far less troops than the days of the GW live fire. During the clinton years we dropped whole divisions from the Army. Not including USMC MEU's, the ground forces of the US is only 10 Divisions. That is just enough to work a six month deployment somewhere in the world every other freakin year. And not enough to fight a two tier combat exercise, while conducting peace and stability operations in, KFOR, SFOR, AFGANFOR, KuwaitFOR, Korea, and homeland security.
Lop sided advantage in tech??? Think of the days of the great war monger-Patton. He had the smaller force, the not so advanced tech, and took a bite out of their butts. He learned to fight against both a superior force, and superior equipment. Yes we have the better equipment. But, will we be supplied on time, Ol Sarge always taught me. Keep em filled with "Beans, Bullets, and Fuel" and they will take the objective.

Felix
__________________
The Lizzie Palmer Tribute



Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty.

John F. Kennedy
35th President of The United States

The Last Shot

Honor The Fallen

Jesus died for our sins, and American Soldiers died for our freedom.




If you don't stand behind our Soldiers, please feel free to stand in front of them.
Felix The Assassin is offline   Reply With Quote