quote:
Originally posted by Dramnek_Ulk:
The united states has encouraged other people to be traitors to their countries before(Like people in russia), therefore to punish someone for being a traitor to USA looks rather like hypocracy and slective morality. Also to punish someone for this kind of thing is an outdated,petty and vindictive thing to do, it is no better than one would expect from the taleban or northan alliance. However to help this person and to allow them to perhaps live a normal life,(if they have not comminted genuine crimes)would be an action truly in the spirit of liberal humanism and kindness, why should he and his family suffer when so many already have. Why not let something positive come out of this dreadful matter?
Oh, give me a break, comrade Dramnek_Ulk!!! John Walker is a TRAITOR!!! The fact that we attempt to create traitors has nothing to do with anything. It only means that the person would have turned traitor against his own country and could be held responsible by that country.
As to how the TRAITOR should be dealt with, I don't know what the best method for handling it would be. The last thing that should happen is turning him loose to his idiot liberal parents. Brainwashed, my butt!!!
Releasing him would not be "an action truly in the spirit of liberal humanism and kindness". It would be a slap in the face of the families that survived 9-11, the familes whose have lost family members in the war, and the country in general.
He is a TRAITOR and should be properly charged, properly tried, and properly SHOT!!!