Ryanamur, papers are at best a day old. Print media is never going to be as immediate as television. It's entirely possible it's been reported and moved on.
The Irish peace process over here got barely a mention in the print I read.
So did the move to rearm Japan - actually I'll post a thread on that question....
Basically there's so much news to pick from, and so many papers that cover it, it's not going to be suprising when some don't report the same things. That's why an individual should get BALANCED INFORMATION from a number of sources.
When I was growing up my Dad would watch the national ABC news (government funded channel) which had a global emphasis, and also watch the highest rating news from Channel Nine - which had a local, ratings driven slant.
Now of course we have the internet which can give us more information - but not all of it is necessarily as reliable because of the lack of accountability. That same lack of accountability can provide a less biased news however.
Pros and cons all around mate, which is why it's good to receive from a variety of sources, and not expect say CNN to be gospel.
------------------
