[Davros]

Well that was the blogger defence JD. But you could also have just said - "OK dear Mr Blogger looks to push his agenda by taking a factual article that someone has written and spewing his own verbal bile around and about it. That looks to be pretty low on form and integrity but lets instead look at the article rather than the stupid loony blogger"

I just think that would have been an eminiently more sensible line for one to have taken [img]smile.gif[/img] . No point really to defending the blogger for his actions in placing a few abusive epithets about someone elses work. That sort of childish action should be condemned wherever it is encountered no matter what side of the political spectrum the deviant wordsmith comes from. Let's not defend him because he is right wing please.

And for dear M who will want at least one comment to be "on topic" - why do you always take the drama queen extreme in your interpretation of what events and consequences must be forthcoming from EU legislations. You seem to take the view that people must inevitably be hurt - that the courts and the appeals that Dreamer128 outlined must inevitably fail. That there is absolutely no way that anyone over there could fail to come to any commonsense outcome - no hope - all over red rover.

I appreciate that there is a network of like minded souls amongst the many sources like these blogs and the NRO and the wonderfully outspoken FOX "NEWS" commentaries that delight in unearthing gems like this about the UN and the EU. Sad to say that these sources only look for the bad in things and hardly ever look for anything positive.

Perhaps it is because these information sources perceive these organisations (UN and EU) as misguided and want to help them improve themselves. Perhaps these sources were suffering from a poor news day and needed a humorous filler, or perhaps these sources feel threatened (though I am afraid I can't supply a reason there as to why) and want to lash out in a small minded manner.