Quote:
Originally posted by Yorick:
quote:
Originally posted by John D Harris:
quote:
Originally posted by Yorick:
You're completely missing the point.
|
WHAT POINT? Yo, you have switched, fipped, flopped, and spun your way around. You bring up a point when asked questions about your point, and how you point works you move, dodge, slide to something totally differant. When your questions are answered you flee to the 'ole you are missing the point.
Answer the questions I asked you earlier as I asked them, I used plain simple words straight to the point no flipping/flopping/ dodging/twisting/turning. I answered your questions, and I did so with statements not another question. Answering a question with a question is an arguement trick that only works if the person you are trying to pull that on is afraid to answer, I ain't afraid of man nor beast. [/QUOTE]I have presented a consistent argument. I cannot help your perception of it. I have not flip flopped no matter how much you suggest otherwise. it is your perception that is out of whack, which is why I said you've missed the point.
As for not answering your questions, they were irrelevent. The type of question is important. It's like asking me "how did God begin". It presupposes I believe God has an origin, therefore I cannot answer the question because I don't believe the presupposed belief. Comprende? [/QUOTE]So you have neither the Manners nor the courtisy(sp?) to engage in a conversation. You throw out terms like arrogant, yet you are the one that decides if a question asked by others are relevent or not. Who gave you the right to decide that? If your point can't handle some questions that's your problem not mine.
Yes you have flipped flopped, the first point you tried to make was the rest of the world has monetary and polictal influence over the USA election, I say it is the US votes that count. You then procede to back up your point by asking questions about how money is raised in order to get US VOTES,
NOT one single thing to back up why the citizens of another country should have any "say" over what goes on in a totaly seperate country. You do understand we are talking about serperate countries each with their own gov't and method of coming power?
You are trying to equate feelings and emotion to reality, the fact is the entire world can vote for anybody they want to, but the winner of the USA Presidental elcetion will be the person that gets 1 over the majority of the electorial college vote from the USA, the rest of the world doesn't matter in the US elections. Guess what the USA doesn't matter in the elections of the rest of the world. That is why we have soveriegn countries, you do know what soveriegn means? Each is seperate, and independant each decides for it's self. AND yes the Afghanis decided for themselves who they would elect, you can't provide one single shread of eveidence that US citizens voted in the Afghanistan election held a few weeks ago! Absent of any evidence your point is null and void.
You try to equate the USA to "New Rome" then talk about Providentals(sp?), but your thesis ignors the reality of what a providence is. To be a providence you would have to be under the USA's Control the USA would decide who run your country. Remember the man the washed his hands in Christ's trial? Was he chosen by the Juedeans or by ROME? He was chosing by ROME because Jueda was a providence of ROME. Show me one soveriegn country that is a providence of the USA!