11-02-2004, 01:38 PM
|
#27
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Stratos:
No, it isn't. [img]tongue.gif[/img]
Technically, if the Coalition troops were to leave to where THEY come, most of the killings would stop as well as the attacks are aimed at foreigners.
Can't do that. "With great Power comes Great Responsibility"...we had to get rid of Saddam...and we HAVE to help the people of Iraq to get back on their feet and to a place where they can join the rest of the modern world. The coalition forces cannot just pick up and leave. It would be a completely morraly corrupt thing to do.
Now, I don't support the troops just leaving, I just wanted to point out that it's not reasonable to blame the insurgents alone on the deaths. It's sounds like you're saying "Sure, we bombed some people, but THEY made us do it".
You cannot and must not judge both sides as if they are the same or equal or even that both ideologies are valid... in this conflict. Both sides do not have to be suicidal immoral anti-humanitarian religious zealots...only one side has to be. The sides are not even, one side is for Human liberty and for freedoms and rights, the other represents islamofacism and supression of human rights and equality.
No, the Coalition is to be "blamed" for the death they cause, just as the insurgents/terrorists are to be blamed for theirs. Again, you are placing both sides on the same moral level and this is wrong. (in my opinion...I know people who can justify any murder or killing so others may have different views)
|
|
|
|
|