|
I find it ironic that thier representative states outright to the U.N. that North Korea is openly violating their commitment and promise to not develop nuclear weapons - yet there is no international outcry about North Korea being a dangerous threat to World Peace or any other criticism or condemnation of their actions.
I also liked Kerry's response that Bush focused on Saddam instead of North Korea, which represents a far more "real" threat. So, exactly what would Kerry do about this North Korean threat? Does he believe we should have invaded North Korea instead of Iraq? If the threat is far more real and serious from North Korea, what plans does Kerry have to neutralize that threat.
What plans would he suggest that would be effective without contradicting his criticism of the intervention actions taken by Bush in Iraq?
__________________
Cerek the Calmth
|