Firstly- Sorry I helped derail your thread into lockdown, Jaradu. I humbly offer to delete my posts if it would get the thread re-opeened so the on-topic discussion can continue.
Secondly- I am a bit confused so I'm going lay this out:
I saw this post by a Mod:
Quote:
By Larry:
So far its fine for me to leave be, as nobody is getting heated or upset here, which is a great thing. The trouble will come if somebody wants to debate against any points made here, however, which will be clearly in the wrong where the ban is concerned.
I'll let this be for now, anyway, since it is informative and good-mannered.
Another moderator may override my opinion if they choose.
|
So, I took this as a greenlight to share the webpage on the topic of Satanism. I then responded when the integrity of the information of that webpage came under question in the spirit of being "informative and good-mannered" although by replying I may have been adding to "debate against any points made" already in progress. Honestly, I had forgotten Larry's warning about debating at this point but my intention was to remain civil and keep mostly to the point of discussing the website in question.
So after my last post in the now locked thread I thought to create this one for clarification on the issue. I reviewed the thread with Satanism as a side topic and it seemed that we were blantantly breaking the moratorium, yet had permission to do so as long as we didn't debate points being made and we remained good-natured and informative. I became confused as to what I could do and couldnt do.
Was I wrong to reply as it seems Mouse's last post suggests? I didn't mean to ignore Larry by reponding to the critism of the websource I provided.
As it seems I might actually have overlooked Larry's warning- I offer an apology to Larry for overlooking and not heeding his words as a Mod in that thread.