Quote:
Originally posted by Timber Loftis:
quote:
Originally posted by Yorick:
Sure. One opinion paves the way for (seemingly) guiltless murder, while the other doesn't.
|
Look, I appreciate your commitment to your cause. However, since the OPINION in question is as to whether it's a human or not, then your statement here is absolutely logically flawed. In fact, neither opinion on the issue paves the way for murder. One opinion disallows murder of a human, and the other opinion can't be murder, because it isn't human. Again, say it louder and stronger, and with more emotional bile all you want, but that doesn't make it true.
Therefore, I hereby award this statement with
[img]graemlins/shine.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/shine.gif[/img]
THE YEARS MOST ACCURATE AND COMPELLING STATEMENT AWARD!!!!!!
[img]graemlins/shine.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/shine.gif[/img] [/QUOTE]Rather than spend time writing a colorful attempt at ridicule why not take just two seconds to think about what I said. Wouldv've saved us both time.
However you define it, one opinion allows life to be destroyed by devaluing that life, the other opinion seeks to protect that life by according it the same value as the opinioners.
Thus, the first opinion rides over the opinion the lifeform may have once it's able to develop the process of opinionating. In short, the proaborter craps all over any rights, life, or needs the developing human lifeform may have, will have, should have or could have.
That is my point which you so quickly attempted to sideline with your wonderful attempt at colourful ridicule. So cheers and have a nice day wonderboy.
[ 08-11-2004, 08:09 PM: Message edited by: Yorick ]