View Single Post
Old 08-09-2004, 06:06 PM   #55
Timber Loftis
40th Level Warrior
 

Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,916
I did not ignore consenting incestuous acts:
Quote:
As for the consanguinity laws, I don't disagree -- they probably aren't needed. EXCEPT, to the extent they can prevent legitimizing molestation in the home, which may be where the laws originated to begin with.
If you would let a single person adopt, you've blown your argument against the adoption by a homosexual couple. Especially since one of the members of the couple could adopt as a single person. Moreover, you've taken away your argument that only couples which could procreate, if they could procreate , should adopt -- because except in the rare case of hermaphrodites like Eric Cartman's mother (and father), a single person cannot have a child.

Quote:
Two abusive fathers is worse than none.
Either this is a red herring to throw us off course into discussing only abusive families, which is a deviation from the discussion so far, or it is an assertion that all gay men would be abusive to their children. Which one is it?

[ 08-09-2004, 06:09 PM: Message edited by: Timber Loftis ]
__________________
Timber Loftis is offline