Quote:
Originally posted by Timber Loftis:
Polygamistic societies strongly favor procreation.
|
And yet none survived outside small enclaves in Tibet and Utah. It doesn't make for a strong society. Weakens the gene pool as well, as you have only one father (or mother in Tibets case) adding to the gene pool. My point stands.
Quote:
Because if gays can marry, they can adopt -- meaning they can "procreate" their ideas onto their children, making those children their own liberal-minded offspring -- even if they had to go adopt them from Azerbaijan or Indonesia. 
|
Ah yes. Where are these children going to come from? In America, abortion is legal, so unwanted children are killed, meaning there are not nearly enough children to satiate the demand for adoption meaning, yes, people go to China, or your aforementioned Indonesia to adopt. It doesn't make for a healthy perpetuating society if those within continually have to go without to simply perpetuate.
That's the beauty about a hetrosexual child producing family. It is it's own source of growth and sustainence.