|
Oblivion, thanks for once again proving my point as to why I object to responding to every single sentence instead of to the point in whole. You don't even read what I write, but simply repeat the same old nonsense you've been repeating all throughout this topic, missing the general point I tried to make. If you need any retortions to those points, go back and read Chewie's replies. I specifically asked people not to pick apart my entire post, and yet you did just that - sometimes not even to counter my words, but to nitpick semantics or just repeat the thing I was already responding to in the first place. Seriously, knock it off.
And I don't care whether it reflects badly on me, but I have too much of a life to pick your post apart, respond to every single "point" made while knowing that it won't make a difference either way; let's just agree to disagree. I know there's a good chance you'll even pick apart this post - well, good for you.
And may the next person using the words "conjecture" and "strawman" be struck by lightning. Seriously.
by the way, about that NRA convention date: it's there on Hardy's site; check the part regarding Kayla Robinson. Once again a provable lie on Moore's part (if Hardy is correct, that is), but I guess still not good enough for court.
[ 07-08-2004, 06:14 AM: Message edited by: Grojlach ]
|