Quote:
Originally posted by Davros:
Sorry JD - you weren't with me - I will clarify for you - "NO LINKS" is my read on things. A couple of contacts do not constitute the links that some people in theAdmin want us all to believe. Hale, Rummy had contact - does that make him complicit?
|
No kidding I wasn't with you there, it went by me, left me standing there holding my jock strap. "DUH, DUH, DUHHA which way did he go, which way did he go."
That goes to what the diffintion of links is, if you don't define contacts started by Iraqi Intel with the purpose of working together and cooperating as links, then your assisment(sp?) is correct. If you define that as links, then the 9/11 commision is correct in that they stated there were no links on the attacks of 9/11/2001. Is complicancy(sp?) required for links, I would say no, but that is for each of us to call for ourselves.