Quote:
Originally posted by Davros:
quote:
Originally posted by Cerek the Barbaric:
As to the point that Hardy had an "agenda" to discredit Moore's film because he is an NRA member....that may be true.
|
I also hear that GW Bush may be President, Saddam Hussien may be captured, Greece may have won the European Championships, and we may not have found any WOMD in Iraq. [img]smile.gif[/img]
Still three weeks to go till I get to see the movie
- I may be looking forward to it. [/QUOTE]
Also, Moore may have had a political agenda with BfC and F9/11. Moore also may have had more incentive to lie and decieve regarding the integrity of his films than Hardy does. Moore may have misrepresented Disney when he claimed they were refusing to distribute F9/11 at the last minute (when he had - in fact - known that was the case for an entire year). Which means that Moore may have actually - {gasp} - lied!!! [img]graemlins/wow.gif[/img]
Even some who are considered fans of Michael Moore (such as acclaimed film critic Roger Ebert) may have corroborated the accusations of deception and misleading editing in BfC and may also have confirmed that he and others were told NOT to say the Academy Award crowd was divided over Moore's speech.
Um...let's see....Moore may have taken several statements by Charlton Heston out of context in his Denver NRA speech and put them together to give an entirely different tone to his words and statements.
etc etc etc
It's a fun game, Davros, but all this spinning and circular arguing is making me dizzy. LOL. [img]graemlins/laugh2.gif[/img]