[Yorick]

Originally posted by Dirty Meg: [QB] Statements like Why? are exempt from the rules that normally govern sentence structure. Some of the single word sentences you have used are completely without meaning. What exactly does it mean to end a paragraph with the word 'Simple'. What is simple? The paragraph? The writer of aforementioned paragraph? I am assuming the latter.

Please. You're not seriously attempting to give me an English lesson are you? How quaint.

If you have a problem with my language, don't read me. Simple. I will not change the way I write simply to fit in your culturally imperious way of noncomprehending my way of speaking. I write how I speak. Comprende?

]Laws are not based on morality. They are based on pragmatic nessecity. Whatever makes society work. I am not advocating any morality at all. What exactly do you think I am ignorant of? Please tell me what objective fact it is that I don't know. Or is it that you are ignorant of the meaning of the word ignorant?

Oh no, laws are based on morality. What makes society work is subjectively dependent on what the society WANTS for itself. There is no grand universal barometre of intention that all societies use. If it achieves what it intends for itself, then society by definition works. It's intent and application however, are SUBJECTIVE, and use subjective morality in the process.

You are wrong. Simple.

I'm not sure if it is because of your communist sympathies, but you seem to believe that everyone should live the same lifestyle. We don't all have to be hetrosexual or homosexual. Only some of us need to be straight to carry on the species. I hope this has been an education for you. Keep the red flag flying Comrade!

Have I said we should all have the same lifestyle have I? Read again. Nowhere have I suggested forbidding homosexuals from having their lifestyle, nor commiting to each other. Unless you've ignorantly prejudged me a "homophobe" or other such rot.

What I have advocated is society's right to encourage and subsidise humans it wishes to.

And for the record, no I'm not communist. Nor am I insulted if you call me one either. However, it's an attempted flame, and I hope the moderators note that in this thread alone, you have now called me -

The product of incest
Not in posession of full mental capacity
A communist

All with the intent to belittle or insult. Just because I have a different viewpoint. Who intolerantly advocates thoughtcrime now?