Quote:
Originally posted by Dirty Meg:
In English, it is traditional to construct sentences from more than one word. Please take this into account in future.
|
Pardon?
Why?
Quote:
|
You evidently don't know what democracy is. What you are advocating is communism. The advantage of democracy over dictatorship is that we don't have to live under anybody's morals. We can do what we like as long as it doesn't infringe on the rights of another human being.
|
And that is a moral you are advocating. The morality that infringing upon anothers rights is WRONG is subjective. So are all our laws. All based on subjective morality. I'm afraid it is you who display complete ignorance here, not me.
Quote:
|
Your last arguement is completely absurd. The same could be said of anybody. If we were all men the human race would become extinct. If we were all bankers the human race would become extinct. Based on your arguement, we should be banning everyone who isn't a hermaphrodite subsistance-farmer. (You are wrong anyway. The human race wouldn't die out if we were all gay. It is theoretically possible to impregnate a women without any male involvement, using the same technique used in cloning.).
|
Er... no... not absurd. Truth. If we were all hetrosexual the human race would not die out. If we all practiced homosexuality, we would die out. If we were all pacifists there'd be no war, if we were all vegetarians we would have a better environment.
We could play this game all day.
Keeping in mind the population growth occurs most in the poorest areas of the planet. It's a good check and balance. The rich nations succumb to childlessness, and die out, replaced by the poorer childbearing nations.