[promethius9594]

TL, your arguement is flawed:

Here's another parallel:

"If a white man who likes black women wants to marry a white woman, he can. But white men cannot marry black women."

Do you see the flaw in your logic yet?

first, black women and white women are both homosapian FEMALES. they are the same. there is no proof that homosexuality is genetic so the whole race card doesnt even come into play.

second, and i think we can both agree, to marry a man is an entirely seperate act from marrying a woman. and yes, it is legal to distinguish between men and women when declaring an act legal or not. thus a man cannot walk into a lady's lockeroom shower without getting arrested for sexual misconduct. in the same way we can legally distinguish between a womans right to marry a man and a mans right to marry another man.

like i said, there is no legal inequality right now. if this were an arguement to expand rights then i would be more comfortable on it, but i will always be sketchy of a movement that skews the numbers and bases arguements on faulty premises.