It seems that i will join the fray.
First of all-Let's say that OBL says the "crusaders" stuff. So? I hardly find these things wrong. From his point of view he is right, because short of killing us one by one he and his organization have no hope of emerge victorious from the war. We have no other way of dealing with terrorrists except killing them, or throwing them into prison for life, which is almost the same. I will say yet another thing-If all the people of "tumbo yumbo" state will become rapers and murderers and thieves (not or. and) the police of "tumbo yumbo" will have to deal with them all according to the law. The law says-death sentence. So be it.
Therefore the point of Kulveer is irrelevant.
Secondly-explain what is "owherwelming" and "too much" force. Colonels and generals have their priorities set in that way when the life of their soldier is far more valued than life of all enemy combatant troops. USA and Israel are very liberal. We could have bombed them from the air thus making 100% sucsess and 0 casualties from our side. We do not do it. USA and Israel do not use owherwelming force, merely because we have casualties. Again the point of your friend is an incorrect one.
Thirdly-About their free will. You always have free will. They can easily resist ala Gandi. Stop going to work at our facilities . Our economy could have suffered tremendous losses. Average israely is too lazy to go to work. Their mentality is however the mentality of the region (including ours)-No force, no results. They chose the way of the bombers. Their problems.
Foursly (sp?)-Terrorist here is a person that: 1)Kills (or does his best to) civilians on purpose. 2)Belongs to organization that says-death to all the x and destroy state y for good.
Terrorist in general is dictionary defeniton. Here however we have an islamic terrorrism. This terrorrism is now the major kind in the world.
__________________
Case from my reservist service:
Kids attention, I have brought you something...
Don't pull that ring private!!
|