Quote:
Originally posted by Black Baron:
Needless to say that since 3 is not 1, the rest of the article is one big lie.
|
Sharp conclusion!
You're wrong, here's my proof
www.sohu.com
Quote:
Originally posted by Black Baron:
There is lots of stuff there and about the tunnels too. Look at the "bold" underlined first paragraph. you will see the number 3 there.
|
חייל ברפיח. "שן קשת ענן" (צילום: רויטרס)צה"ל: במבצע "קשת בענן" נהרגו 41 מחבלים
ו-12 אזרחים, נהרסו 56 בתים ואותרו 3 מנהרות להברחת נשק
Wow, there IS something I can read. It's a "3". It could be 3 apples, 3 fighter planes or 3 dictionaries, but there are most certainly three of them.
Now about the post:
I think it's rude to prove your point by linking a page most of the IWF members and very possibly none of the posters on this thread (save you) understands. I almost never link pages in German and that's at least the same script. I cannot even guess what's in this article and so I feel a bit puzzled.
Disproving an article is not as simple as finding one wrong number and automatically assuming everything else is wrong too.
Of course it's a poor comparison and this can be proven quite easily by debating calmly.
The main problem with large-scale wars or military actions risking civilian collaterals is obvious.
For every terrorist you catch you incite two new ones.
You may stop the weapon smugglers today but if you destroy some homes in the course you've just made the most effective PR for every terrorist in the area and doubled their numbers tomorrow.