Quote:
Originally posted by Night Stalker:
Which is the "shitty" thing to do? For a company to tell a movie maker that they will not distribute a movie? Or, for a movie maker that didn't like the answer he got a year ago to create a negative publicity stunt because the whiney brat didn't get his way a year ago, and the answer still hasn't changed? Hmmmmm .......
If Mr. Moore were so concerned about his message, he would have found investors that actually had intrest in distributing his spew. But no, all publicity, even negative publicity is the drug of choice for this narcassistic addict. He chooses to now smear Disney and try to bully them into distributing his "truth".
|
No, i quite agree with you here. In theory there is nothing sh**ty about a company not wishing to distribute a film if they think it's bad for their image, but surely the problem is the 'cronyism' that goes on with this Bush administration, especially now it seems to reach even to the sub-state level?