Quote:
Originally posted by Thoran:
One thing I noticed (I wonder if you all noticed the same thing) was the amazing invisible shift of the dem's from claiming the President is a loose cannon attacking without provocation (pre-book deal) to claiming he should've done something pre-9/11 but didn't (post-book deal).
|
If by 'dem's' and 'book deal', you are refering to Clark, then it is worth noting he is a registered republican who served under Reagan and Bush I before Clinton.
We did attack Iraq without provocation and we could have done something more vs Al Queda before 9/11. Both of these points go for both Bush II and Clinton, though attacking Iraq is more on Bush II as he led an invasion/occupation where as Clinton just bombed them. I'm not a dem (nor am I a repub- partisanship sucks IMO).