Quote:
Originally posted by Donut:
quote:
Originally posted by Timber Loftis:
I also further note that you are often trying to explain the terrorists' messages and what they are complaining about and what they are trying to say. Personally, I don't give 2 farts about those things -- I just want to see their dead terrorist corpses laid out in a pleasing arrayment of justified death. My opinion.
|
And that, in a nutshell, is why you will never defeat terrorism. [/QUOTE]Maybe. Listen, as long as someone is willing to pursue peaceful means of protest, I'm all for them. Once they use terrorist acts against civilians as a negotiating tool, I don't care what they have to say, wish only to react to violence with violence, and will see them in hell before I capitulate. They want to start a game no one can win, that's fine by me. If they use violence, and then we as a society back up and start bending to them, we have let an amoral means accomplish their goal -- that cannot be. There is a moral point here that in fact is worth all of us dying for. (IMO, of course).
Oh, and Skunk, I personally think it was shitty of you to lump OBL, Blair, and Bush into one "lawless" basket yet again. For one, no one can prove Bush and Blair broke any laws. You can allege this, assert that, and wave your liberal hands about in the air yelling "the sky is falling," but there CERTAINLY is reasonable doubt as to any illegality. I've explained before how the law itself was quite legal, in fact no one has seriously asserted it wasn't in any real way (i.e. filing a case with the UN), so I shan't do it again. I just note that it saddens me that every time I try to entertain a serious discussion with you, you turn into a shit. Your continued baseless allegations are called slander and libel.