Quote:
Originally posted by Timber Loftis:
Better yet, if there were a Palestinian state, terrorist attacks by Palestinians could be viewed as an act of war, and Israel would be justified in responding by attacking an enemy state.
|
Sorry Timber, but it doesn't seem to be the inference given by the above quote. You say specifically that if Palestinians carry out attacks (as in anyone who happens to be a Palestinian, whether or not they have state authority) then Isreal would have the right to respond militarily. Maybe this is just poor wording, but this paragraph seems to be at odds with what you actually meant according to your last post. Please clarify...
__________________
[img]\"http://img1.ranchoweb.com/images/sproutman/certwist.gif\" alt=\" - \" /><br /><br /><i>\"And the angels all pallid and wan,<br />Uprising, unveiling, affirm,<br />That the play is the tragedy, man,<br />And its hero the Conquerer Worm.\"</i><br /> - Edgar Allan Poe
|