True that bias is most everywhere JD, but in this case three people from very different backgrounds (American green, American family values, Australian right center) all looked at the article and pretty much assessed it as being unusually low in its bias and slant quotient.
I would have thought that the 3 of us were a pretty diverse group JD (certainly we have crossed swords on a number of points before [img]smile.gif[/img] ), so that leads me to the conclusion that you would have done better to have picked a different article that better displayed the points about bias you were making. I concede your point is valid, but think your example didn't really support it.
__________________
Davros was right - just ask JD
|