My bringing of attention to the bais in the article is not that the article is not fair and even handed but rather there exists bias everywhere of some sort. There has been many occasions where bias for bias sake has been condemed, because it conflicts with the bias that one holds, yet the same type of bias is commended when it argees with the bias that one holds.
If a man can't admit his own biases how can he ever examine to find out if his bais is reasonable and logical. I understand a lot of people are not familar with what has gone on in the past press about the U.S. elections,and is strickly brought up for those that wish to think and examine what is said in the upcoming U.S. elections, and future U.S. elections. As the old saying goes believe 1/2 of what you are told and virtualy none of what you read.
