[Davros]

Like the other pair JD - I think the writer deals with the pair rather even handedly. Certainly with none of the "we at FOX conjecture" type slants, it simply sets out to give the reader an insight into the backgrounds of two people when considered among the events of the time. I don't see that it takes a side, makes a political decision for the reader, or pushes either political agenda to the detriment of the other.

I haven't been exposed to any historical attacks on the Bonesmen, so from what TL and Cerek say I concede that you may have an axe to grind on that score. I am more inclined to TL's view that it is a nitpick though, because your argument is that the writer is biased because he has not attacked in the manner that others did. He doesn't attack the Bonesmen and he doesn't attack either member of it - that is still even handed treatmnt JD.