Why should Michael Moore (who I can take or leave) have to question/expose all sides equally to have credibility? He's a "liberal" and undermining centre-right groups and interests is what he has specialised in and does best.
It's a bit like criticising a consultant dermatologist because he does not dedicate equal time to performing open heart surgery.
[ 02-18-2004, 04:45 PM: Message edited by: Mouse ]