Quote:
Originally posted by Night Stalker:
I don't really care who leaked the info, disclosing the identities of field operatives is unlawful at best and treasonous at worst. The fact is SOMEONE did leak the info. The author claim a White House source and claims protection of that source under an NDA. Congress is currently looking to remove the NDA. They have already made the request to the White House for assistance (CNN run a few days/weeks ago). We'll see how this pans out. Not sure about your tie in with Slick Willie.
|
The "tie in" is in referance to this qoute from your earlier post:
Quote:
Originally posted by Night Stalker:
Just as I feel that W J Clinton was rightly Impeached (and should have been convicted) for abusing Governmental power and resources for personal gain, I feel this Administration is tap dancing into that same mine field - only the personal reasons are much more insideous than W J Clinotn's
|
The differance being that the leak accusation is from the WHITE HOUSE, WJC's perjury was from the mouth of the President himself. Not from a White House source, which could be any one of 1000's of white House employees. The point is that Blaming the President for the Presidents actions is differant, then blaming the President for the aledged actions of a White House employee. It will be interesting to see what President Bush's reaction will be if and when the leaker is found out. I'll make a bet right now the leaker will not be protected.